Center for the Future of Arizona
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820538372
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6024961360
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,796,081
- Expenses
- $6,465,069
- Assets
- $2,448,917
- Liabilities
- $597,141
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SYBIL FRANCIS (PRESIDENT & CEO & CHAIRMAN)
Highest reported compensation
- SYBIL FRANCIS (PRESIDENT & CEO & CHAIRMAN): $281,358 total reported compensation
- AMANDA BURKE (MANAGING DIRECTOR): $262,760 total reported compensation
- PETER BOYLE (EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP/INNOVATION): $185,618 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educationin fy25, cfa continued its commitment to building a strong education system that prepares every child to succeed and thrive by expanding career-connected pathways, advancing student-centered learning, and strengthening school leadership development. Cfa continued advancing a six-year federal education innovation and research project - cfa's first-ever federal grant - marking a significant milestone in the organization's growth and national credibility. The project engaged 12 high schools and seven community colleges across Arizona, with 345 students participating in design challenges that informed the expansion of dual and concurrent enrollment and it and cybersecurity pathways. The project reinforced a clear lesson: when schools, colleges, and employers collaborate to offer meaningful, real-world opportunities, students are more likely to take ownership of their education and career paths. (cont'd on sch o) cfa is carrying these insights forward by integrating the findings into its early college work and sharing the research broadly to inform practice and systems change across the state. For decades, cfa has played a leading role in advancing the future of learning in Arizona - always with a focus on the success of each individual student. Cfa works alongside school systems across the state to help move education beyond a one-size-fits-all approach, supporting learning environments that recognize students' strengths, needs, and pathways. In fy25, cfa advanced this work by supporting leaders, school systems, and educators as they put student-centered practices into action. In collaboration with knowledgeworks, cfa launched the emerging leaders cohort, supporting current and aspiring leaders within the Arizona personalized learning network. The cohort includes 20 participants from districts across the state, strengthening leadership capacity to advance equitable student outcomes.cfa also expanded access to professional learning through the Arizona personalized learning network (pln). With knowledgeworks and the asu prep digital virtual teachers institute, cfa offered pln explore, a series of no-cost, on-demand modules available to any Arizona educator, with more than 300 modules completed to date. In addition, the third pln launch cohort engaged more than 200 educators across 30 school-based teams, supporting implementation of personalized, competency-based practices through peer learning and collaboration.this year, cfa expanded the beat the odds school leadership academy (bto) to yuma county, partnering with yuma esd and mohawk valley esd to launch the region's first cohort. Cohorts in phoenix and paradise valley also concluded, bringing the total number of bto participants to more than 460 leaders across eight Arizona counties. Through bto, cfa equips leaders to align vision, practice, and systems in ways that improve outcomes for students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.5%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.5% of revenue deployed · 78.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $281K · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $915K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.