Center for Supportive Schools Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222962532
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Princeton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6092529300
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,764,203
- Expenses
- $18,300,433
- Assets
- $7,842,374
- Liabilities
- $4,709,312
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JONATHAN D MATHIS (PRESIDENT AN)
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN D MATHIS (PRESIDENT AN): $310,410 total reported compensation
- SHERRY BARR (CHIEF PROGRA): $243,749 total reported compensation
- CATHERINE BELL (CHIEF GROWTH): $218,622 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Css helps schools become places where students want to be. We partner with schools in three areas: developing all students into leaders; empowering teachers to collaborate with each other and with students; and engaging entire school communities to improve how learning happens.
What it reported doing in 2024
"achievement mentoring (am): a school-based prevention and intervention program, developed by dr. Brenna bry, that pairs adult school staff with students in one-to-one mentor-mentee relationships and has been proven to reduce problem behaviors, improve academics, and reduce school dropout among at-risk students. "data-driven continuous improvement: a data-informed, relationship-driven initiative that provides schools with the ability to (a) build a sustainable infrastructure for analyzing critical data in publicly accountable ways, and (b) share productive dialogue throughout the school community (administrators, faculty, other staff, students, parents, and key community members/organizations) about strengths and areas of need that leads to the implementation of targeted and customized actions. "when students lead: gives middle and high school students the opportunity to elevate youth voice and engagement on issues important to them. Participating students receive evidence-based leadership training to help them become effective advocates for causes they are passionate about and to inspire their peers to advocate for change within their school communities. Students are equipped with the skills to conduct research, analyze data, problem-solve, and communicate effectively with stakeholders in their communities. "tobacco related programs are implemented in partnership with the nj dept. Of health & senior services in support of a grant received from the center for disease control & prevention (cdc), as well as the food & drug administration (fda). The cdc grant focused on increasing the number of school districts in New Jersey that implement a comprehensive tobacco-free school policy, with the goal for schools to utilize prevention, intervention, and cessation strategies versus the traditional emphasis on suspension for tobacco infractions. The fda grant focused on reducing the accessibility and availability of tobacco products to minors by conducting year round tobacco inspections in retail establishments to ensure that the nj law prohibiting retailers to sell tobacco products to persons under the age of 21 is being enforced. The main goal of year round inspections is to prevent the increase of retailers' violation rates and keep it no higher than 10%. "other customized solutions: css's solutions are created in response to the specific needs of schools. Css has designed custom solutions for over 150 public and private schools throughout the united states. As with all css models, our custom solutions take root within schools and make a lasting, sustainable impact that persists long after our involvement. We accomplish this by investing significant time into developing a strong stakeholder group within the school and then by working with school faculty and staff using an intensive train-the-trainer strategy, user-friendly curricula, and technical assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $15.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $310K · 29 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.