Center for Success Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463792734
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Detroit, MI, USA
Phone
3133208961
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,132,060
Expenses
$929,126
Assets
$672,661
Liabilities
$228,531

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALEX RESNIK (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREA MEYER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETA)
  • DEREK J IKELER RESIGNED 2024 (BOARD PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREA MEYER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETA): $101,215 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Center for success unites literacy and community to empower students in the journey of education.

What it reported doing in 2024

We exist to ignite a passion for education and inspire students to thrive academically. Through structured interventions specific to each learner, we expose students to various experiences that encourage them in their journey towards self-identified goals. We provide space and structure for students to collaborate with a dedicated mentor. Our intention is to pave the way for lifelong, engaged learning. The center for success network (cfsn) delivers evidence-based literacy and youth development programs that advance academic achievement and strengthen social-emotional skills for k8 students in under-resourced communities. Through a proven model grounded in one-on-one literacy mentoring, consistent enrichment programming, and strong school partnerships, cfsn provides the personalized support students need to thrive.cfsn's impact is demonstrated through both measurable student growth and long-term engagement. Each year, students receive approximately 60 hours of individualized literacy intervention, targeted skill-building, and relationship-based mentoring. Our programs consistently drive accelerated academic outcomes: on average, students gain 4 independent and 4 instructional levels in a single program year, significantly narrowing achievement gaps in districts with some of the lowest proficiency rates in Michigan.our model centers on meaningful connections. More than 300 trained volunteer literacy mentors provide one-on-one support, resulting in high program consistency and strong student retention. Cfsn also delivers after-school enrichment in steam, social-emotional learning, and project-based learning, ensuring students receive a holistic experience that supports their academic success and personal development.in 2024, cfsn: provided over 25,000 hours of individualized literacy mentoring, supported by trained volunteers, certified teachers, and americorps members. Ensured that 84% of students demonstrated measurable reading growth, with the majority accelerating faster than grade-level expectations. Expanded school and community partnerships to increase access to high-quality after-school programming for students with limited existing options.cfsn has measured program efficacy for more than a decade, with a focus on literacy outcomes, social-emotional learning indicators, and the protective factors that contribute to lifelong success. Our work is driven by the belief that every child deserves the opportunity to achieve their full potentialand our results continue to prove that when students are given the right support at the right time, they thrive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.3%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.3% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $750K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.