Center for Social Inclusion
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900686577
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2122482785
- Rating
- 33
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25
- Expenses
- $105,676
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLENN HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CASSIE SCHWERNER (BOARD MEMBER)
- GLENN HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
- RANDALL OAKLEY (VP, FINANCE & ADMIN)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o.
What it reported doing in 2022
Center for social inclusion has aligned its programmatic work with itsparent entity, race forward. Race forward brings systemic analysisand an innovative approach to complex race issues to help people takeeffective action toward racial equity.our vision and mission: vision: race forward imagines a just, multiracial, democratic society, free from oppression and exploitation, in which people of color thrivewith power and purpose.mission: race forward catalyzes racial justice movement building. Webuild strategies in partnership with communities, organizations, andsectors to advance racial justice in our policies, institutions, andculture.our theory of change details our organizational methodologies. Thetheory of change calls for race forward to pursue racial equity in fourways: grow power: we need connected and aligned networks of people, organizations, and movements to build the collective power (economic, social, political etc.) necessary to counter structural racism and steward transformative solutionsfor racial justice.transform culture: we must harness the power of narrative, arts, andculture to assert the full humanity of communities of color, challengeracist ideologies that fuel structural racism, and envision a more justand equitable future.transform policy: we must position communities of color and otherhistorically oppressed communities as leaders and decision-makers inthe policy-making process to create racially equitable policies at alllevels.transform institutions/sectors: institutions across multiple sectors ofsociety (e.g. Government, philanthropy, non-profit, private, etc.) mustoperationalize racial equity in their policies, practices, programs, and productscenter for social inclusion is dissolving, and this is the final tax return for the entity. All programmatic activity will continue at its parent/transferee entity race forward.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -422,604%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.