Center for Rural Outreach and Public Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364563009
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Sewickley, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2812241443
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Coalitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $656,522
- Expenses
- $611,356
- Assets
- $149,026
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN THOMAS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BEVERLY SANTICOLA (EXECUTIVE DI): $100,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Crops' mission is "to partner with indigenous and underserved rural communities to reach economic, health and social equity."
What it reported doing in 2025
Capacity building services for the ute mountain ute tribe provide leadership development, team development, problem solving, program design, strategic planning, social media consulting, grants management, evaluation and facilitation services for numerous federally funded grant programs awarded by hrsa, samhsa, usda, doj, doe, hhs, fhwa, dot, doi, and more. In 2015 crops orchestrated the first ever ute mountain native national partnership retreat that was attended by 20 tribal leaders, 20 national partners and 40 federal agencies to benefit 2,100 low-income members of the tribe. In 2023 crops planned and implemented the tribes second native national partnership retreat called nuchu: planning our vision that prioritized 8 major capital projects with an estimated 240m in new funding needs and the creation of over 500 good paying jobs in the next 5 years. Over 50 federal, state and private funding agencies attended the event including 20 tribal leaders. Crops has helped the tribe generate 180m in 10 years in new funding for broadband, transportation, new housing construction, housing rehabilitation, water, wastewater, education, healthcare, renewable energy, and economic development. In 2025 crops hosted a housing retreat and rural funders learning session for the ute mountain ute tribe with over 50 participantes at the housing retreat and 25 at the rural funders learning session. The two combined events produced over 4.25m in new grants for the tribe within 6 months. Also, in 2025 crops held a similar strategic planning retreat with the blackfeet nation, a tribe of over 17,000 located in northwest Montana. The 3-day event was attended by over 50 tribal leaders and representatives from federal and state agencies. The results of the event were used to develop the tribes comprehensive economic development strategy plan which won 3 gold international anthem awards for business strategy, product, and innovative fund development. Crops was selected as one of the top 5 nonprofit organizations for quality and innovation by the anthem awards out of 2,000 nominations from 42 countries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $556K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.