Center for Research and Education in Technology
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 451540923
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Gallatin, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6302804372
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $87,930
- Expenses
- $123,341
- Assets
- $69,335
- Liabilities
- $4,023
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
People named in this filing
- DENISE TERESE-KOCH (PRES/SECY)
- DR EDWARD ROSSOMANDO (PRES EMERITUS)
- DEBRA BRIDGES (Chairman)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Charitable purposes within the meaning of 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (or the corresponding any future unitied states internal revenue code). Such puroses shall include, but not limited to, the coordination of the acquisition and installment of state-of-the-art dental equipment and dental schools throughout the united states. In doing so the corporation will assist in the development of the dental profession by providing dental students with the educational opportunity to be trained on the use of the latest dental technology.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program service accomplishments: improving public dental care for patients and promoting advanced technology into schools so students can perfrom the best patient care. Cret is a facilitator between the dental university and cret member companies. Members provide advanced technology so dental students can treat patients with state of the art technologies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -40.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.