Center for Occupational Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352118417
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Terre Haute, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8122387000
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,766,212
- Expenses
- $1,776,013
- Assets
- $336,603
- Liabilities
- $2,338,623
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JACK HILL (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MATTHEW NEALON (TREASURER): $679,970 total reported compensation
- JACK HILL (PRESIDENT): $658,813 total reported compensation
- PATRICK TITZER MD (VICE PRES & SECRETARY): $507,034 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Center for occupational health's mission is to provide a full range of occupational health services in prevention, treatment and rehabilitation for terre haute, Indiana and surrounding communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Relationship of activities to the accomplishment of the exempt purpose: center for occupational health, inc. Meets the occupational health care needs of the terre haute and surrounding communities' employers in the areas of prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation. These services are delivered with an emphasis on cost containment through early intervention and expert case management. The center for occupational health, inc. Clinic is equipped to conduct basic injury care, physical examinations, and the following ancillary services: x-ray, collection of specimens for laboratory analysis, pulmonary function testing, audiometry, electrocardiogram (ekg), radiology, and vision screening. Certain services are contracted in the treatment components. Hand surgery, neurology, physiatry, orthopedics, and ophthalmology are all contracted with individual physicians and or specialty groups who provide their services to patients of the center for occupational health, inc.'s at the specialists' office. Center for occupational staff work closely with the specialist to assure streamlined communication with the physician and the employer and insurance carrier, thereby providing coordinated care for the patient producing better clinical outcomes. Center for occupational health, inc. Is committed to cost containment for its employer clients and/or their insurance carriers. Since the organization specializes in occupational health, approximately ninety-nine percent (99%) of the fees for all cases are paid either through the employers' workers' compensation insurance or directly by the employers. Due to the unique field in the medical continuum, occupational health providers charge the fees for care to the employers' workers' compensation insurance or the employers. The employees are not directly responsible for payment for their care. Thus, the need to provide charity care by the organization itself is virtually nonexistent. The organization will refer patients, when medically indicated, to union hospital where charity care is provided, should it be necessary. Center for occupational health, inc. Provides consultations at no charge to the local industry on safety and ergonomics with the aim of providing a safer work environment. Also, the center for occupational health, inc. Provides numerous educational programs for the community including: injury prevention, department of transportation drug testing/physical compliance, osha regulations, ergonomic and safety. All educational programs are available to interested parties in the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.7%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.95; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.7% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $680K · 3 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.