Center for Object Relations
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911645772
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2068091538
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $178,074
- Expenses
- $133,561
- Assets
- $330,185
- Liabilities
- $860
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLISON CHOW (President)
People named in this filing
- ALLISON CHOW (President)
- CORINNE VANCE (Treasurer)
- RACHEL KENNEDY (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Details: Center for Object Relation's mission is to extend to the broader community an awareness, knowledge, use and understanding of the British Object Relations view of (1) child development, (2) the resulting internal world in every human being, and (3) its expression in human relationships. This shall be accomplished through education, training, research and service.
What it reported doing in 2024
BOR II - Cultivating a clinical mind and body through experiencing OR concepts as they present themselves in the consulting room, moving from intellectual to embodied understanding.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.2%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 29.5%; rating input score 30
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.47; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.2% of revenue deployed · 29.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $39K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.