Center for Migration Studies of New York Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237036022
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123373080
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Population Studies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $951,826
- Expenses
- $1,132,736
- Assets
- $808,421
- Liabilities
- $268,832
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- C MARIO RUSSELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- C MARIO RUSSELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY): $228,154 total reported compensation
- JOHN K APPLEBY (SENIOR POLICY FELLOW): $142,847 total reported compensation
- WAYNE DE LEON (FINANCE/HR OFFICER): $111,337 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Devoted to the study of international migration; to the promotion of compassion and understanding between immigrants and receiving communities, and public policies that safeguard the dignity and rights of migrants, refugees and newcomers.
What it reported doing in 2024
The center for migration studies of New York (cms) is a think tank and an educational institute devoted to the study of international migration, to the promotion of understanding between immigrants and receiving communities, and to public policies that safeguard the dignity and rights of migrants, refugees, and newcomers.cms carries out its mission by:- conducting person-centered research and evidence-based policy analysis.- publishing scholarly and policy-relevant work on its website and in its two journals, international migration review and journal on migration and human security, and other publications.- hosting strategic conferences, symposia, meetings, and webinars.- providing expert support to faith-based organizations (fbos), community-based organizations (cbos), and policymakers.- maintaining an extensive archive with collections spanning the history of immigration to the united states.cms works with policy-makers on international, regional, national and local levels; scholars and researchers; faith-based groups; non-governmental organizations; and other civil society organizations.cms was established in 1964 and formally incorporated in 1969 by the congregation of the missionaries of st. Charles, scalabrinians, which is dedicated to serving migrants and refugees throughout the world. Cms continues to live out the mission of its founders by producing research and policy proposals centered on the experience of migrants.cms is a member of the scalabrini international migration network (simn), a global network of migrant shelters, service centers, and other institutions. Simn is active in 34 countries in north, central, and south america; africa; europe; australia; and asia. Cms is also one of seven scalabrini migration study centers (smsc), a network of think tanks on international migration and refugee protection.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 42.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $978K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $228K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.