Center for Independence of the Disabled in New York Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 132984549
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126742300
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,845,872
- Expenses
- $11,740,971
- Assets
- $11,619,050
- Liabilities
- $6,440,606
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUNITA DUTTA ESQ (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN O'NEILL PHD CRC (VICE PRESIDENT)
- YULIA STESHENKO CFP (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SHARON MCLENNON WIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SHARON MCLENNON WIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $349,743 total reported compensation
- PAULA GOOLCHARAN (DIRECTOR OF LTCOP): $128,410 total reported compensation
- ARTHUR SCHWARTZ (ASSOC GENERAL COUNSEL): $120,043 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The center for independence of the disabled, New York's goal is to ensure full integration, independence and equal opportunity for all people with disabilities by removing barriers to the social, economic, cultural and civic life of the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Founded in 1978, the center for independence of the disabled, ny (cidny) is a leading advocate for the civil rights of people with disabilities in New York city. We work one-on-one with individuals to create a roadmap to achieve their goals. We educate people with disabilities about their rights and the public todeepen understanding of disability.- we listen to our community and together we educate the public and policymakers.- people with disabilities lead our advocacy network, offering leadership and skill development.- we research and survey conditions in the community to identify barriers that impede access.- we share our findings with policymakers to advocate for correction of the barriers we find.- we partner with the university of New Hampshire to provide the public and policymakers with up to date information on status and well-being of people with disabilities.- we advocate with lawmakers and in the courts for fair and effective policies that will increase opportunities for full inclusion and for implementation and enforcement of existing law.- we demonstrate for our rights.- we educate and help people with disabilities learn to navigate complex systems and, through appeals, solve difficult problems that impede access to education, employment, housing, health care, food and transportation.- we help people know whether they are eligible for community supports and apply for them.- we use our experiences as people with disabilities and our knowledge to help them achieve goals that will improve their lives.- we educate the public to enhance their understanding of disability issues by appearing in leading mainstream media outlets and through social media and encourage people with disabilities to participate in public dialogues on key issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 81% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $85.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $350K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.