Center for Hope Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521681279
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4106014673
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Abuse, Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,938,547
Expenses
$10,450,129
Assets
$11,755,377
Liabilities
$6,763,950

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ADAM ROSENBERG (DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • NEIL M MELTZER (VICE PRESIDENT/ LBH PRESIDENT/ CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • NEIL M MELTZER (VICE PRESIDENT/ LBH PRESIDENT/ CEO): $4,111,501 total reported compensation
  • LESLIE R SIMMONS (LBH COO): $2,078,988 total reported compensation
  • DAVID H KRAJEWSKI (TREASURER/ LBH CFO): $1,986,680 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Advancing hope, healing, and resilience for those impacted by trauma, abuse, and violence through comprehensive response, treatment, education, and prevention.

What it reported doing in 2024

Crisis response services cfh ensures that allegations of child sexual abuse, trauma, and similar offenses against children are investigated and responded to without forcing children to be re-victimized or relive their experiences for each investigator who needs information. Each child talks one-on-one with one of cfh's forensic interviewers, social workers trained in national standards for forensic assessment. This gives children the opportunity to say what happened in their own words. This crisis response has been the foundation of cfh's operations for 30 years. Cfh is available within two hours of an allegation and includes a 24/7/365 on-call service and walk-in program, serving families around the clock without waiting to schedule an appointment. This 24-hour program is one of the first of its kind in the country and the only one in Maryland. During fiscal year 2025 (july 1, 2024 through june 30, 2025), forensic interviews and risk assessments were provided for 519 children. Medical examinations cfh's medical facility is located in the same building as cfh's interview facilities; therefore, children are able to receive an examination on-site the same day as their interview to determine if any physical signs of trauma are present. Cfh provides this service in accordance with the guidelines set forth by Maryland child abuse medical professionals, as well as the accreditation standards of the national children's alliance, a membership organization that creates best practice standards and provides professional resources to the nation's more than 900 children's advocacy centers. In fiscal year 2025, cfh's medical team conducted 598 medical examinations for children at cfh's on-site medical clinic. In addition to conducting 182 forensic medical exams in cases of suspected child sexual abuse, cfh also provided 416 initial medical screenings for children entering state sponsored foster care. Providing medical care on-site furthers cfh's goal of creating a child-friendly environment and streamlined care by eliminating the need for clients to make a separate appointment at a hospital or physician's office. Victim support and advocacy services cfh's family advocacy team provides ongoing follow-up support services for families, including home, school and community visits, court support, and assistance in accessing food, housing, educational, legal assistance programs, and referrals for ongoing mental health services. In fiscal year 2025, the family advocates conducted 4,514 sessions for 987 clients. Mental health services in fiscal year 2025, therapists at cfh's mental health clinic saw 135 clients in 1,486 sessions. Training, prevention & outreach cfh trained professionals and parents/caregivers from Maryland, across the country, and around the world. Over 100 trainings were held with over 10,000 participants attending training on our online training platform or in facilitator led trainings (in person or virtual). The team contracted with 3 agencies to develop child protection policies. Forensic interview education and training the forensic interview research and education program provides education and training to forensic interviewers, child protective services staff, law enforcement, legal, medical, mental health professionals, multidisciplinary team partners and other victim service providers on the fit forensic interviewing model, tele-forensic interviewing and other topics related to serving victims of child abuse. In fiscal year 2025, forensic interview educators conducted 30 training sessions for 810 participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 71% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 28
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $4.1M · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 45 of 45 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 51 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.