Center for Global Policy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475261222
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Santa Clara, CA, USA
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Affairs, Foreign Policy, & Globalization
- Affiliation
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,431
- Expenses
- $538,713
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- FARID SENZAI (BOARD MEMBER): $8,497 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o for primary exempt purpose
What it reported doing in 2019
Publish weekly analysis piece: publish a weekly analysis of the most pressing issue impacting muslimgeopolitics. The analysis piece, which we refer to as the navigator, is written by one of our many scholars andreviewed and edited by our editorial team. The weekly analysis piece provides insight on muslim geopolitics andgeared towards thought leaders, journalists and the general public. These are written by our network of scholarsand edited by our in-house editorial team. Publish policy briefs: publish monthly policy briefs to provide relevant, timely research and policy analysis onissues impacting u.s. Relations with muslim majority countries. Our policy briefs written by cgp scholars andexperts are focused on providing policy recommendations to thought leaders and the policymakers. As part ofthis effort we strive to broaden the parameters that go into specific foreign policy decisions and to expand the scope for addressing key foreign policy issues. Produce podcasts: engage scholars and policy experts on timely and relevant topics through in-depthinterviews. Translate these interviews into digital format and short 30-minute podcasts. Prepare online fordistribution and posting on the cgp website. The podcasts are available for download. The aim is to helpeducate thought leaders, policymakers and the general public by providing context and in-depth background onissues impacting muslim majority countries. The podcast interviews are conducted by cgps director, every twoweeks. Publish op-ed articles: our scholars write regular op-ed articles that are published in major news outletsincluding the New York times, cnn, the Washington post, national interest and foreign affairs as well asnumerous other news outlets. These op-ed articles address current events in the field of foreign policy andmuslim geopolitics. Research and publish special reports: provide objective, original and empirically based research and policyanalysis about the social, political and cultural issues in muslim societies. This includes an examination of theroots of extremism and muslim politics. These in-depth reports contribute to a more informed assessment ofcomplex issues facing muslim societies. It also helps us provide more detailed review of a topic so thatpolicymakers and thought leaders will have sufficient context and historic background to the issues we face.these in-depth reports are researched and written by our scholars and go through a thorough review and editingprocess from our in-house editorial team. Produce short explainer videos: produce short videos to explain complex topics and translate them into ashort, easy to understand digestible format. These videos often include graphic animation, text and video clips. The explainer videos are available to download for the public. The aim is to help educate thought leaders, policymakers and the general public better understand complex issues related to muslim geopolitics. These areproduced as a team effort with our staff and scholars and video assistance from local video producers. Policy events and briefings: organize policy events to think tank experts and briefings to governmentofficials. The aim of these events and briefings is to give policymakers and government officials opportunity tohear directly from scholars and experts researching topics related to muslim societies. These events andbriefings are conducted by our scholars and directors. Engage in roundtable discussions: organize roundtable discussions, seminars and panels to provide newand creative approaches to conflict prevention and peacebuilding. Engage experts to ensure the u.s. Policymakers are using the most constructive and cost effective tools to protect u.s. Interests without violence. Identify the best ways to counter violent extremism and promote religious tolerance including efforts to provide practical recommendations to improve the rule of law in chaotic, post-conflict settings. Distribute material; use traditional methods to p
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 4
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3,633%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -30.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $500K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.