Center for Global Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 743074033
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Plano, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4692378501
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $133,044
- Expenses
- $123,561
- Assets
- $58,789
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- FILIP BUYSE (DIRECTOR)
- DAVID GASMIRE (DIRECTOR)
- JOHN RAYBURN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Established in 2003, the center for global ministries (cgm) is aworldwide church-planting ministry, patterned on the home church model of the first century church.partnering with christian leaders in the host country, we: 1) help them form home groups, 2) equip them with multimedia teaching and discipleship materials in their language, 3) support them through continuing relationship and the services of short-term missions teams and 4) enable them to reach out and meet the needs of their communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Israel/jordan: support is provided to pastor ehab ashkar for hisministry to arab believers in the northern israel area. Included in thesupport is pastor ehab's personal support, annual children's summercamp programs, family counseling, youth camps, leadership training forpastor ehab and various needs to support the local church and operatingexpenses. Counseling and bible study programs reach over 350 familiesin the galilee area of israel. Meetings are weekly and in the case ofindividual counseling on an as needed basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.8%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $89.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.8% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $103K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.