Center for Genomic Interpretation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820918164
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Sandy, UT, USA
Phone
8018104097
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,680
Expenses
$61,236
Assets
$2,235
Liabilities
$500,069

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Julie M Eggington (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Julie M Eggington (CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Organization is to build an expertly curated, comprehensive human genetic variant database that, once established, will significantly contribute to the scientific research findings that will be published and made available to the public. Through our work we will identify genetic markers of disease, which is the first step to identifying cures for both hereditary and somatic diseases.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Organization shall, through interactions and outreach with patients, clinicians, genetics laboratories, genetics advocacy groups, academic institutions, and the general public, advance the science and application of genetic variant classification and educate the public on the current scientific status of clinical genetics and the need for improvement in the methods by which clinical genetic diagnoses are determined. Our interaction with the general public through our citizen science efforts, will educate the general population on the science of genetics and genetic variant classification, and will provide a novel and disruptive mechanism toward the classification of genetic variants. Specific activities that will accomplish these ends are the deposit of clinical genetic variant classifications into publicly funded and publicly available database repositories, the transparent publication of variant classification methods and conclusions in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and the involvement of crowdsourcing efforts, all of which will educate the general public and the academic community and increase the awareness of the need for increased quality in clinical genetics.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -267.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 223.74; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.