Center for Economic and Social Rights Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133744727
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126530978
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,244,259
- Expenses
- $1,054,338
- Assets
- $567,383
- Liabilities
- $437,971
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIA RON BALSERA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MEGHNA ABRAHAM (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIA RON BALSERA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $132,533 total reported compensation
- MEGHNA ABRAHAM (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $22,823 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Research and advocacy to promote economic and social rights
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, cesr continued to strengthen our community of practice by linking partners across the globe to strategize and work together in pursuit of a more equitable and rights-based global economy. This includes convening partners to share strategies and learnings on the sidelines of major international advocacy events, including those organized by the united nations (un), group of twenty (g20), and international monetary fund (imf). We have also continued to build alliances and bridge movements throughout latin america through our role as the secretariat of the initiative on fiscal policy and human rights. Cesr continued its advocacy work to challenge unjust tax, debt and budget policies in numerous countries across the globe - including the philippines, nepal, uganda, ghana, zambia and across latin america, while also advocating internationally for fairer fiscal policies to realize human rights and reduce inequalities. For example, we've carried out work on a women's human rights impact assessment of climate finance projects with partners in nepal. We also undertook advocacy in international fora such as the un, the imf, and the g20. For example, we worked with partner organizations around the globe to input into the debates and processes around a un tax convention, as well as brought together partners from brazil and south africa to share g20 advocacy strategies. Cesr provided tools, training and support to scores of human rights activists and defenders across the globe on how to monitor economic and social rights and ensure accountability for them. This included the ongoing application of the decoding injustice toolkit. Decoding injustice was used in trainings with partners in nepal, ghana, uganda, and el salvador. It was also the focus of the decoding injustice learning lab, which brought together 25 activists from asia, africa, latin america, and north america to participate in virtual workshops and peer learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.2%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 75.7%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 87.6%; rating input score 88; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.2% of revenue deployed · 75.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $798K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.