Center for Documentary Expression and Art

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942937284
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
8013553903
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
History Museums

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$205,773
Expenses
$173,847
Assets
$378,712
Liabilities
$40,083

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • LESLIE KELEN (EXECUTIVE DI): $54,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Center for Documentary Expression and Art (CDEA) is dedicated to using the tools of documentary work—oral history, photography, film making, narrative writing, visual art, and music– to help Utahns look inward to better understand our state’s past and present and to gaze outward to discover our multifaceted connection to the nation and the world. CDEA creates and supports projects that examine and honor the cultural, spiritual, and ethnic identities of our nation’s diverse population in forums wherein we can acknowledge differences, establish common ground, and hence, build community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization realizes its mission by developing documentary projects that use some or all of the facets of documentary work, which is defined as: oral histories, photography, video, visual art, research, oral storytelling, and narrative. A project may use some or all the features of documentary work. For example, a project may develop a traveling photography exhibit with audio guides and a publication; or a project may rely on traditional oral histories with accompanying still photographs; or a project may aim to produce a series of short films with a website. There are many effective ways to present documentary work. Cdea projects that produce traveling exhibits are accompanied by multi- faceted, education-outreach programs and fall into two categories: (1) major exhibits created for large museums that contain national subject matter infused with significant human rights issues, and (2) educational exhibits designed primarily for use by Utah's k-12 public school students, community centers, libraries, and smaller museums that explore the state's and nation's multi-cultural history and environmental issues. Exhibits traveling inside Utah are presented under the title place-based education (pbe) and contain four-to-eight-week, place-based, artists/scholars-in- residence (asir) programs (pbe-asir). Documentary projects resulting in major exhibits the development of documentary projects resulting in a major stand-alone publication, or in a traveling exhibit with books and films is ongoing. On the average, documentary projects that result in a stand-alone publication or in a major exhibit take four-to-six years to research, develop, design, and produce. Between 2006-2011, the organization completed a major exhibit titled, this light of ours: activist photographers of the civil rights movement. This project presented the civil rights movement through the work and voices of eight men and one woman who documented the national struggle against segregation and other forms of race-based disenfranchisement from within the movement. The exhibit inaugurated the human rights gallery at the leonardo: an art, science, and technology center, in downtown salt lake city, in october 2011, and remained available to the Utah public for nine months, or until june 2012. The presentation of this light of ours included cell-phone accessible audio guides for youth and adults; a free, six-page brochure for use by students and the general public; a 53pg curriculum guide for grades 7-12; and a 251pg book published by the university press of Mississippi. The organization also organized a month-long symposia at three Utah universities and a community college involving local and national activists and historians. Cdea also partnered with Utah's pbs affiliate, kued-tv, to create Utah's freedom riders, a 30 minute film presenting Utah's civil rights activists. More than 58,000 people visited the display in Utah, with about thirty percent of visitors being k-16 students. In 2013, following the exhibit's debut, the organization's executive director was retained by the Utah state board of education (usbe) to create an eight-week, on-line course to introduce Utah public school teachers to the civil rights movement. Director kelen has taught the class on an intermittent basis since 2013. In fall 2013, this light of ours: activist photographers of the civil rights movement started traveling outside Utah. A five-year period (2013- 2018) was set aside for the exhibit's initial national tour. This touring period culminated with the exhibit's display at the irving arts center in irving, Texas, between january-march 2018. In may 2018, the organization partnered with the maltz museum of jewish heritage, located in cleveland, Ohio, to carry out a second five-year tour. The start of the tour was delayed by the 2019-2020 outbreak of the covid-19 pandemic, interfering with the february-august 2020 display at the bullock sate history museum, in austin, Texas. A second natio

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 88% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.9%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $27.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.5%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.18; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 70.9% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $144K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.