Center for Creative Partnerships
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844388705
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-PF 2020
- Location
- Orangeburg, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8039286851
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,672,554
- Expenses
- $83,017
- Assets
- $2,640,020
- Liabilities
- $185,266
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ellen N Zisholtz (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Ellen N Zisholtz (President): $64,600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Center for Creative Partnerships is a Conscience and Social Justice organization that promotes community involvement through the arts and humanities, including civil and human rights. One of the organization's principal goals is to restore and maintain the long-term viability of historical, cultural, and community icons.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Center for Creative Partnerships is integral to the redevelopment of the City of Orangeburg, focusing on history, civil rights, the arts, and community, and is part of the Development Team chosen by the City to re-envision Railroad Corner, the historic black business district across from two historically Black Colleges (HBCUs) to include a Civil Rights Museum. The Center has secured ownership of All-Star Bowling Lanes and will preserve this important African American Heritage Site as a historic site, a community asset, and a state-of-the-art Bowling Center, creating the first Civil Rights Bowling Lanes/Justice Center, on the national African American Civil Rights Network. It will honor the victims of one of the most violent episodes in the civil rights movement, while creating a bowling center for fun and reconciliation for the community and the universities, attracting visitors from around the world. Phase I is supported by a $500,000 African American Civil Rights grant in the amount of $500,000 from the Historic Preservation Fund administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.HISTORYCenter for Creative Partnerships was created in the late 1990s by Ellen Zisholtz and historic preservation Architect, Craig Morrison. The first project was the development of strategic and marketing plans for restoring and operating the historic Alamo Theatre in conjunction with the Smith Robertson Museum as the centerpiece for the preservation of Farish Street as an African American Cultural/Entertainment District. Alamo Theatre restoration: Canizarro, Cawthorn & Davis Architects. A similar project followed in Charlottesville, Virginia with the restoration of the historic Paramount Theater as the centerpiece for the redevelopment of cultural Charlottesville. In New York City, as Director of the Rod Rodgers Dance Company, Ellen worked with the City of N.Y. to restore a historic city building and with Cooper Square Committee, cultural groups, and area residents to preserve and develop affordable, environmentally healthy housing in conjunction with cultural spaces on 4th Street near LaMama. She developed and managed a cultural building with the 4th Street Theater in the lobby, Duo Teatro on the second floor, and Rod Rodgers Dance Company and dance studio on the third floor. Later, as Managing Director of INTAR, International Arts Relations, when Theater Row was renovated, a space was provided by the City to renovate as a theatre at 52nd Street and 10th Avenue and she supervised the early renovation.PURPOSEThe purpose of the Center for Creative Partnerships is to: Serve the community and its young people by establishing educational and cultural facilities and opportunities; Encourage critical thinking, creative skills, and social consciousness; Assist with planning for community development focusing on history, equity, tourism, and cultural opportunities. In order to carry out its mission and purpose, the Center for Creative Partnerships enters into partnerships, collaborative programs, and consultancies with individuals and organizations including cities, communities, museums, theaters, and schools.STRATEGYSince the firm works through partnerships and collaborations, we are able to select the best people and organizations for each project. The Board of Trustees and Advisory Council are comprised of respected experts in a variety of fields including preservation architecture, economic and community development and encompasses civil rights heroes, community leaders, and University Presidents. Center for Creative Partnerships has a successful history of using the arts and humanities for social justice and civil rights initiatives including the 50th Anniversary of Freedom Summer Committee; Exhibition and youth workshops at Meridian Museum of Art; Social Justice Medal in Philadelphia, MS commemorating Andrew Goodman, James Chaney and Mickey Schwerner; Civil Rights Symposium at Penn Center, SC.CAPABILITIESCenter for Creative Pa
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 96% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.6%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $2,997.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 95%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 31.8; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 77.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 100.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 61.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 51% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.6% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 14 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $585K reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.