Center for Contemporary Sciences Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843817744
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Phone
4733659693
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$129,518
Expenses
$369,154
Assets
$215,832
Liabilities
$14,854

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AYSHA AKHTAR (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • AYSHA AKHTAR (CEO)
  • DAMON ISAACS (CHAIR)
  • JESSICA MCDONOUGH (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Using science to do good. To unlock the power of science to find solutions that improve the health and wellbeing of humans, animals, and the planet.

What it reported doing in 2024

Advocacy/policy: ccs leads targeted advocacy efforts to shape large-scale national health policies and improve statewide legislative agendas. Through engagement with key stakeholders across industry, academia, medical agencies, and various branches of the u.s. Government, we seek to transform medical research practices, advance sustainability initiatives, and promote pandemic prevention measures. We rely on evidence-based science to modernize public policy and execute advocacy campaigns that benefit society, protect the environment, and promote animal welfare. Sciences/technology: ccs works on multiple fronts to shift the existing paradigm in medical research and other health-impacting areas. The ccs investor summit is a one-of-a-kind business development event that connects innovators, investors, researchers, and venture philanthropists to support modern technologies in the emerging field of human-relevant alternatives to animal experimentation. The ccs innovation circle brings together partners across various sectors to provide a unified voice for the scientific community and policymakers, fostering the discovery, development, refinement, and adoption of the best scientific innovations that can replace ineffective animal testing. Threats: ccs provides scientific perspectives on the human health threats posed by wildlife trade and factory farming. We engage with health agencies and other stakeholders in support of progressive initiatives aimed at mitigating these risks. Education/training: ccs serves as a trusted resource for educating stakeholders, including academics, policymakers, and students, about pandemics, human health threats, and the latest breakthroughs in science and technology-such as human-relevant testing methods. Our in-house fellowship and internship program attracts students and emerging professionals looking to hone their skills in a rigorous, cross-disciplinary environment. Additionally, ccs regularly produces free public events, informative databases, and educational materials. Through these initiatives, we strive to raise public awareness, drive generational change, and develop a network of informed professionals equipped with the knowledge, tools, and resources needed to tackle some of the most pressing health challenges of our time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 31.1%; rating input score 31

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -185%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -40.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.6% of revenue deployed · 31.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.