Center for a Brighter Future Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462851431
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Davidson, NC, USA
- Phone
- 3042827400
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $5,389
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- William Maloney (President/Director)
People named in this filing
- John Smallridge (Director)
- Tom Graff (Treasuer/Director)
- William Maloney (President/Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Corporation is organized for the common good and general welfare, including but not limited to that of the people of the State of West Virginia, by advancing a legacy of prosperity for future generations based on the key principals of freedom and independence. The Corporation will educate, support and advocate on the benefits and merits of solutions to public issues that are based on free individuals and free markets. The corporation plans to extend funds for research and policy development, and to publish its positions on the policies. It will do so through press releases, social media, distribution to e-mail and subscriber lists, and other outlets. It may organize educational conferences, rallies and events to highlight policy issues and proposed solutions. It will conduct polling on issues, legislations, and policies and use those in connection with its policy development. It will support its policy positions with issue-related advocacy, lobbying and advertising in various
What it reported doing in 2017
Provide information on issues through social media, distribution to e-mail and subscriber lists, and online web outlets to highlight policy issues and proposed solutions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -149.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -99% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.