Centennial Skating Club of Colorado Springs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840820238
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
7196590912
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Winter Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,565
Expenses
$0
Assets
$100,933
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kelly Moon (President)
  • Carol Knieriem (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kelly Moon (President)
  • Carol Knieriem (Vice President)
  • Jelena Tompkins (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This Corporation is organized to promote and encourage full participation in the sport of figure skating by persons in the Colorado Springs, Colorado area regardless of race, sex, religious creed, color, national origin or ancestry; to improve and to advance amateur figure skating on ice in all of its forms, including compulsory figures, free skating and ice dancing; to sponsor, to produce or cooperate in conducting competitions in figure skating; all for the ultimate purpose of supporting, promoting and participating in national and international competitions in connection and conjunction with the rules and general policies and guidelines of US Figure Skating. All receipts of the Corporation shall be used in the furtherance of the purposes and objectives of the Corporation.

What it reported doing in 2024

Skating Programs: The membership was served by exempt purposes including skating clinics, educational library, recital, and test sessions for over 300 skaters in the Colorado Springs area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.