Centennial Park Figure Skating Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
870650244
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
West Valley City, UT, USA
Phone
8013475558
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,022
Expenses
$71,479
Assets
$64,302

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tami McNeil (President)
  • Tiffany Kennard (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Charlene Welch (Secretary)
  • Taylor Kennard (Treasurer)
  • Tami McNeil (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Centennial Park Figure Skating Club (CPFSC) is a figure skating club. The mission of CPFSC is to provide opportunities for figure skaters to compete, perform and grow as athletes and artists.

What it reported doing in 2024

Competition & Testing: This is a local competition that follows the structure of USFS. This includes JUVENILE, INTERMEDIATE, AND NOVICE SINGLES, PAIRS, AND ICE DANCE, and COLLEGIATE levels. This offers key developmental and competitive opportunities. Judges are brought in from across the country and the world to support the growth and development of the competitors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.5%; rating input score 39
  • Program expense ratio: 57.4%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.3%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 85.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.5% of revenue deployed · 57.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.