Celtics Baseball Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562485797
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Manhattan, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8154052386
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $81,560
- Expenses
- $73,436
- Assets
- $15,531
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RYAN M MCWILLIAMS (PRESIDENT, T)
People named in this filing
- RYAN M MCWILLIAMS (PRESIDENT, T)
- KRISTI MCWILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDE)
- RYAN J MCWILLIAMS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This corporation shall be a nonprofit corporation. The purposes of the corporation are to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be oganized under the general corporation law of Illinois. Specifically, celtics baseball, inc. Will be organized and operated for the purposes of (a)instructing or training individuals for the purpose of improving or developing his/her capabilities in the sport of baseball, (b) fostering national amateur sports competition, and (c) reducing juvenile delinquency by providing extracurricular activities. Furthermore, the purposes for which celtics baseball, inc. Is organized are exclusively charitable and educational within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986 or the corresponding provision of any future united states internal revenue law.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.1% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $73K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.