Celtic Arts Supporting Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844081633
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Mount Vernon, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3604164934
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,200,494
- Expenses
- $96,680
- Assets
- $6,233,224
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARILYN MCLEAN (PRESIDENT)
- DAVID LOFGREN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- CAYLEY SCHMID (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CAYLEY SCHMID (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $104,327 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To financially support the celtic arts foundation in its mission to sponsor, encourage and promote celtic culture through events and educations activities.
What it reported doing in 2025
The celtic arts supporting organization resources partners focused on promoting celtic culture through events and educational activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 18
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4.6%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 46.5%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 95.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 64.47; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -32.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 4.6% of revenue deployed · 46.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.