Celsa Southern California
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 956094919
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Walnut Creek, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7142588390
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,656
- Expenses
- $121,937
- Assets
- $267,891
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gary Kraus (President)
People named in this filing
- Gary Kraus (President)
- Steve Slocum (1ST VP)
- Richard Sullivan (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation functions as the exclusive bargaining agent in all labor related matters with local union no. 12, international union of operating engineers, afl-cio and union negotiations undertaken on behalf of its members on a tri-annual basis. 1. To do such things as may be necessary or advantageous to the members with repsect to the advancement of the best interests of the association.2. To assist the members of this corporation and their employees in working out problems which may confront them including those arising under any state or federal unemployment, labor or old age laws.3. To cooperate in the consideration of legislative enactments, including tax measures, which may affect the members of the profession of civil engineering and land sureveying.4. To keep statistical data. 5. To act as agent or representative of any members which this corporation, or its representatives, is entitled to represent.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -59.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.