Cedars-Sinai

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
951644600
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, United States
Phone
1-800-CEDARS-1 (1-800-233-2771)
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,868,996,069
Expenses
$4,746,868,087
Assets
$13,245,259,510
Liabilities
$3,323,607,695

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

49 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS M PRISELAC (PRESIDENT/BOARD MEMBER)
  • PETER L SLAVIN MD (PRESIDENT/BOARD MEMBER)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS M PRISELAC (PRESIDENT/BOARD MEMBER): $9,076,459 total reported compensation
  • EDUARDO MARBAN MD (EXEC DIRECTOR-HEART INSTITUTE): $4,546,853 total reported compensation
  • KEITH BLACK MD (CHAIR-NEUROSURGERY): $4,220,602 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At Cedars‑Sinai, art plays an essential role in healing and wellness. Throughout our halls, you’ll find magnificent works and hands-on creative programs thoughtfully integrated into the care environment—to support reflection, resilience and recovery. From calming moments in hospital corridors to interactive programs that engage patients, families and staff, art helps shape spaces that feel more human. Our pioneering work connecting art to healthy outcomes reinforces our belief that healing involves the whole person, not just a condition. Discover Art & Healing Sports Partnership.

What it reported doing in 2024

Clinical care: the care provided at cedars-sinai is as unique and vibrant as the communities it serves. Cedars-sinai is committed to clinical care, research and education to meet the needs of the communities we serve and improve the health of our patients. In fiscal year 2025, cedars-sinai medical center reported 296,191 inpatient days and 965,181 outpatient visits. Other volume measures include 46,731 inpatient admissions, and 90,276 emergency department visits. (see schedule o for continuation)(continued)as one of the largest academic medical centers in the western united states, cedars-sinai provides many highly specialized services that are not available at most other hospitals, and which require a significant infrastructure of technology and expert staffing. In fiscal year 2025, surgeons at cedars-sinai performed the nation's first robot-assisted microsurgical head and neck cancer reconstruction. This breakthrough allows surgery on blood vessels thinner than a human hair and reflects cedars-sinai's commitment to innovation and advances in patient care. The comprehensive transplant center and smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai completed 682 solid-organ transplants in calendar year 2024, with survival rates meeting or exceeding the national average. Cedars-sinai is among the top 10 u.s. Transplant centers by volume and is known for accepting complex, high-risk cases. Cedars-sinai guerin children's marked its third anniversary by serving more families and adding innovations that include a neuro-neonatal intensive care unit protecting newborns' brains, a small-baby unit supporting premature infants, and a genomics center to better understand and treat pediatric diseases. Cedars-sinai earned a five-star rating from the centers for medicare & medicaid services for the eighth time in a row. Around 10% of u.s. Hospitals receive this highest distinction, which measures categories including safety, readmissions, patient experience and effective care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $23.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.6%; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 79.4%; rating input score 79; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.1%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.79; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 27 of 34 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.2B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $9.1M · 49 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $113.4M reported
  • Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 14 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 239 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 248 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.