Cedar Valley United Way

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
420801846
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Waterloo, IA, USA
Phone
3192356211
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,577,151
Expenses
$2,115,798
Assets
$2,684,031
Liabilities
$818,915

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBBIE ROTH (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEBBIE ROTH (PRESIDENT): $104,291 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cedar valley united way works to advance the common good by focusing on education, financial stability, and health. These are the building blocks for a good life. The organization provides the tools to a quality education, which leads to a stable job, and enough income to support a family through retirement and good health. The goal is to invest today to make the lasting impact to prevent problems from happening.the organization directs education resources so children are prepared to succeed in school, so young people can graduate from high school, and so young adults make a successful transition from high school to work life. The organization helps families become financially stable and independent by investing in programs with proven strategies to improve economic well-being. Programming includes job and skills training, overcoming barriers to family-sustaining wages, financial literacy, and services that cover the full spectrum of housing needs for those seeeking a place to call home.the organization strategically invests in community programs to support education from early childhood through adulthood. Initiatives include capacity-building in early childhood education, mentorship programs, learning and leadership opportunities, and support for academic achievement, particularly for vulnerable youth. The organization advocates for a multi-generational approach to enhance impacts, helping both children and parents achieve success through education.the organization directs resources to improving physical and mental health outcomes throughout the lifespan. We invest in multi-generational health initiatives promoting healthcare access, maternal and infant health, and preventing and addressing family violence and child and elder abuse. Through collaboration, the organization aims to reduce health barriers, promote healthy behaviors, and empower individuals to lead healthier lives. Continuum of services range from prevention to treatment and crisis intervention. The organization invests in emergency solutions so a temporary set back does not become permanent.the organzation provides access to information and referral services using the 211 system.the organzation has the ability to respond as needs arise through social innovation and community partner funding.the organization directs management and support for books for babies, the campaign for grade level reading, the cedar valley mental health summit, local book drives and the a women's career mentoring program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.8%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.8% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 28 people listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 39 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 38 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.