Cedar Rapids Police Bargaining Union
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383893711
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Cedar Rapids, IA, USA
- Phone
- 3192865457
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,760
- Expenses
- $9,569
- Assets
- $424,558
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE BAILEY (President)
- JOSH CARTER (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- CHIP JOECKEN (Treasurer)
- JESSE MOORE (Director)
- CHRISTINA VANOUS (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To secure the economic interest and working conditions of it's members. To improve the standard of professionalism, integrity and practices of the cedar rapids police department and to sponsor and promote educational programs for the betterment and advancement of the union's members. To cooperate with other bargaining units, employees and department management of the city of cedar rapids, ia. To establish and maintain such further programs as may be desirable to advance the above purposes and objectives of the union. To assist members without regard to race, creed, color, sex, religion, age or disability for the purpose of improving wages, benefits & working conditions. To obtain the status of exclusive bargaining representation for eligible employees with the cedar rapids police department and to process & resolve grievvances & enforce all other rights arising out of the collective bargaining relationship between the union and the city of cedar rapids.
What it reported doing in 2025
The union AIDS in processing and resolving grievances and enforcing all other rights arising out of the collective bargaining relationship between the union and the city of cedar rapids, ia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 11
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.4%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 78.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 44.37; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.4% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.