Cedar Park Typhoons Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270196116
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Cedar Park, TX, USA
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $66,137
- Expenses
- $56,120
- Assets
- $90,872
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Katie Crowly (President)
- Cara Owens (Vice President and Circuit Rep)
People named in this filing
- Katie Crowly (President)
- Cara Owens (Vice President and Circuit Rep)
- Jason Blankenberg (Webmaster and Communications)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Cedar Park Typhoons Swim Club is to provide the young people of our community the opportunity to participate in a fun recreational summer league swim program to teach the basics of competitive swimming skills and to instill a lifelong enjoyment of swimming in a supportive family atmosphere. We strive to provide an enjoyable safe and healthy environment in which our swimmers learn the values of competition sportsmanship teamwork and individual achievement. We view hard work regular practice self-discipline goal-setting and teamwork as important life skills and believe summer swim is the ideal setting to grow individually in competency and character.
What it reported doing in 2023
Swim Program: The Cedar Park Typhoons swim team had 237 swimmers between the ages of 4 and 17. Four coaches were staffed and participated in 7 swim meets in the Northwest Swim Circuit in Central Texas
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.1%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.