Cedar Creek Schuetzen Verein
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 746028429
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Carmine, TX, USA
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $135,306
- Expenses
- $48,641
- Assets
- $180,017
- Liabilities
- $720
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHERRIE WINES (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHERRIE WINES (PRESIDENT)
- TONY DOOLEY (VP INTERNAL)
- VICKIE LARUE (VP EXTERNAL)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's purpose is to provide a facility for civic activities and a place whereby the community can gather for the promotion of music and fine arts. In addition the organization's scope includes raising funds in order to assist in funding the local volunteer fire department and to community residents who have faced catastrophic emergencies.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization's purpose is to provide a facility for civic activities and a place whereby the community can gather for the promotion of music and the fine arts. In additiion the organization's scope also includes raising funds in order to assist in the funding the local volunteer fire department and to community residents who have encounted catastrophic emergencies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 35.4%; rating input score 35
- Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.7; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 35.4% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.