Cecropia Strong Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862608668
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Marblehead, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7817718721
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,984
- Expenses
- $61,946
- Assets
- $27,486
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Julia Hahnke (President)
People named in this filing
- Julia Hahnke (President)
- Nancy Marshall (Treasurer)
- Lisa Connor (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To offer charitable assistance, education, and therapy to the physically disabled through: 1) bringing care and hope to the newly-physically disabled while they are in the hospital; 2) matching the physically disabled with colleges and universities that offer assisted technology, and any and all other appropriate means.
What it reported doing in 2024
Amy's Gifts of Hope-monthly gifts of stuffed animals, gripper socks, toys, notecards, and chocolates to brain injury, stroke, spinal cord injury, amputees, burn victims, and children born with congenital problems at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital in Boston, MA and Beverly Hospital in Beverly, MA.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.2%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 58.3%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 56.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.2% of revenue deployed · 58.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $36K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.