Cecil Dye Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474183564
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Phone
5138841489
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,150
Expenses
$52,834
Assets
$8,404

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE REED (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROY BUSHMAN CPA (TREASURER)
  • STEVE REED (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL VINCENT CALIGURI (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The cecil dye foundation inc accepts donations from the public and then distributes funds to needy families battling cancer. Applicants submit a detailed request noting their condition and financial needs and come primarily from the cancer unit of the jewish hospital in the kenwood area of cincinnati, as referred by the physicians and nurses there. Board members are friends of cecil dye, who set up the foundation before passing away from cancer. Board members are volunteers who assess the needs of applicant before making donations to them to help them cover living expenses while unable to work due to cancer treatments

What it reported doing in 2025

During the year donations of funds were paid to several families battling cancer and in dire financial need as identified by the staff at the cancer center of jewish hospital kenwood and their applications

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 94% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.6%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.