Cdh-delnor Health System
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363099698
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Winfield, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6309331600
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $182,143,896
- Expenses
- $176,546,415
- Assets
- $1,048,370,382
- Liabilities
- $615,255,077
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
38 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Cdh-delnor health system's mission and objective is to establish and maintain organizations for the provision of healthcare to the community on a not-for-profit basis.
What it reported doing in 2012
Cdh-delnor health system (d/b/a cadence health) accomplishes its mission of providing healthcare to the community through management of a system of related not-for-profit healthcare organizations. During the tax year, cdh-delnor health system served as the parent and managing entity for healthcare organizations including: central dupage hospital association (community hospital), delnor-community hospital (community hospital), community nursing service of dupage county (home health and hospice), central dupage physician group (primary and specialty physicians), delnor-community residential living (senior residences), pahcs ii (occupational health services), central dupage special health association (coordinated pharmacy services within the system), living well cancer resource center (support for cancer patients), cadence health foundation (fundraising) and delnor-community health care foundation (wellness). Cdh-delnor health system supports these organizations by providing management oversight, long-range planning, marketing, finance, accounting, internal audit, compliance, privacy, legal, information systems, business development, treasury, and other administrative services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.4%; rating input score 99; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.3%; rating input score 77; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.94; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 17 of 22 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $151.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.6M · 38 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
- Money network: 35 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 47 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.