Cdf Healthcare - Cenla Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842419446
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Alexandria, LA, USA
Phone
3188782463
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$492,112
Expenses
$208,789
Assets
$5,168,192
Liabilities
$4,299,027

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH DEBOLT (DIRECTOR)
  • KAYLA EDWARDS (DIRECTOR)
  • JEFFERY RICHARDSON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The general purposes of cdf cenla are to further the charitable purposes of its solemember, cdf, including without limitation the following: to buy or otherwise acquire, own, develop, hold, manage, control, lease, sell, operate, improve and otherwise deal with property, facilities, and equipment of all kinds in connection with the acquisition, development, construction, ownership, maintenance, and operation of facilities to provide residential and outpatient programs for low income persons including persons sufferingfrom mental health, behavioral health, and substance abuse/addictive disorders and related conditions, including without limitation individual and group therapy, medication-assisted treatment (when appropriate), relapse prevention education, life skills development, family counseling, and ongoing support to individuals struggling with addiction, aiming to promote long-term sobriety while addressing the underlying social and psychological factors contributing to substance use

What it reported doing in 2023

The general purposes of cdf cenla are to further the charitable purposes of its solemember, cdf, including without limitation the following: to buy or otherwise acquire, own, develop, hold, manage, control, lease, sell, operate, improve and otherwise deal with property, facilities, and equipment of all kinds in connection with the acquisition, development, construction, ownership, maintenance, and operation of facilities to provide residential and outpatient programs for low income persons including persons sufferingfrom mental health, behavioral health, and substance abuse/addictive disorders and related conditions, including without limitation individual and group therapy, medication-assisted treatment (when appropriate), relapse prevention education, life skills development, family counseling, and ongoing support to individuals struggling with addiction, aiming to promote long-term sobriety while addressing the underlying social and psychological factors contributing to substance use disorders, with a focus on community engagement and outreach to reach underserved populations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.75; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.83; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $209K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.