CCMH Child Care Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824361105
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Carrollton, MO, USA
- Phone
- 6605421695
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Day Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $142,125
- Expenses
- $38,390
- Assets
- $715,051
- Liabilities
- $963
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Anna Barlow (President)
- Tom Burkhardt (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Timothy Reid MD (Director): $363,577 total reported compensation
- Rachel Davidson (Chief Communication Officer-CCMH): $153,778 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide child care services to enable individuals to be gainfully employed.
What it reported doing in 2024
CCMH Childcare Center provides high quality, affordable early childhood education and care for infants and young children ages six weeks through five years, serving both hospital employees and families in the broader community. The Center is licensed to serve up to 40 children and operates five days per week, closing only for six national holidays to ensure reliable access to care for working families. Tuition rates are intentionally kept affordable, with discounted rates offered to hospital employees, to support workforce stability and community well-being. The Center utilizes a research-based curriculum designed to promote healthy social, emotional, and cognitive development across all age groups. Statement continued on Schedule O.In addition, the program supports workforce development by serving as a hands-on learning site for students pursuing careers in early childhood education through apprenticeship and training programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 73%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.63; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 247.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 27% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $364K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.