Coastal Conservation League
Legal name: CCL Farm Conservation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923509005
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Charleston, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8437252066
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $35,732
- Expenses
- $163,753
- Assets
- $4,802,213
- Liabilities
- $4,068,515
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Faith Rivers James (Director): $232,931 total reported compensation
- Joel Sandstrom (Chief Financial Officer): $75,943 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advocacy that makes conservation possible.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Organization will assist the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League (CCL) in its programs and services by undertaking the (a) acquisition of a leasehold interest in certain real property located at 1814 Harmon Street, Charleston, South Carolina 29403 (Land), including the new food hub facility constructed and developed by CCL on the land (Facility) and (b) leasing of the Land and the Facility to CCL for operating (collectively, (a) and (b) are referred to as, the Project). The activities of the Organization will be funded through its participation as a qualified low-income community business as defined under Section 45D of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and as a borrower in a new market tax credit (NMTC) transaction. (Continued on Sch. O)The Corporation obtained a loan from TCDE 104, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (CDE) to finance a portion of the acquisition of the Land and Facility. CCL will lease the Land and Facility to the Organization for a term of 99 years pursuant to a Ground Lease Agreement between CCL, as ground lessor, and the Organization, as a gournd leasee (Ground Lease). Pursuant to the Ground Lease and a Reimbursement and Contribution Agreement between CCL and the Organization, the Organization will reimburse CCL for a portion of the costs to purchase and construct the Land and Facility (Development Costs), and CCL will make a contribution in-kind to the Organization of the remaining Development Costs. The Organization will lease the Land and Facility to CCL for a term of 30-years pursuant to an Operating Lease Agreement between the Organization, as lessor, and CCL, as lessee. The Organization's Board of Directors will conduct the activities of the Organization. The activities of the Organization will be ongoing to assist with the food programs of CCL. The activities of the Organization will allocate all of its time promoting and assisting CCL in accordance with its exempt purpose. The Project will provide a much-needed food hub facility in Charleston, South Carolina. The NMTC financing utilized by the Organization will enable CCL to raise additional capital for its food programs at the Facility.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -358.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 29.33; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -135.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $153K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $233K · 6 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.