Ccc of Western Kentucky

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813881226
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Paducah, KY, USA
Phone
2704425738
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Counseling, Support Groups
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,792
Expenses
$98,521
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOHN DALE (DIRECTOR)
  • GARY ENLOW (DIRECTOR)
  • CHAD KERLEY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation formed in 2016 to provide christian based counseling services for individuals and families in the western Kentucky area with a christ-centered approach to empathize, to educate, and to empower them so that their burdens can be transformed into a manageable load. The counseling services will be based on the values the corporation believes christ taught for restoring hope, respect, dignity, and self-worth to every person. Counseling services are provided for individuals and families at reduced or no fee through the establishment of a good samaritan fund for those without insurance coverage or ability to pay full so that no one will be denied needed counseling services due to lack of resources.

What it reported doing in 2020

The corporation provided christ-based counseling services based on the values the corporation believes christ taught for restoring hope, respect, dignity, and self-worth to ever person they encounter.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,350.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 54.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -58.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -50.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $92K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.