Caya Counseling Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900979643
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Stockbridge, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4043249159
- Rating
- 33
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $221,112
- Expenses
- $78,173
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REV DR HERMAN HAYNES (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- MAXWELL SEARS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MAXWELL SEARS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $37,448 total reported compensation
- KARLENE SEARS (DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBER): $1,670 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Caya nbsp; counseling nbsp; services nbsp; inc nbsp; was nbsp; established nbsp; on nbsp; the nbsp; principle nbsp; that nbsp; there nbsp; is nbsp; greatness nbsp; in nbsp; all nbsp; of nbsp; us nbsp; caya nbsp; counseling nbsp; services nbsp; inc nbsp; will nbsp; explore nbsp; through nbsp;*heuristic nbsp; dynamic nbsp; on nbsp; who nbsp; told nbsp; you: nbsp; the nbsp; greatness nbsp; is nbsp; not nbsp; within nbsp; your nbsp; reach nbsp; or nbsp; your nbsp; destiny nbsp; gi
What it reported doing in 2021
Organization provides counseling services to individuals
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 50%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.