Catholics & Protestants Seeking

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204988539
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Midland, GA, USA
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Limited
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$20
Expenses
$750
Assets
$168

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The orginazation is dedicated to bridging relationships between protestants and catholics and encouraging every catholic to become a strong disciple and missionary through promoting the strength and value of catholic education and the study of the bible.

What it reported doing in 2012

During 2011 we continued on bridging relationships between protestants and catholics. One of the goals of caps is to establish a sunday school structure in the catholic church. Expenses for 2011 were used for developing an in depth powerpoint presentation summarizing the history of the sunday school structure in the southern baptist church and the steps required to establish a sunday school from scratch. Rev. Daniel edmonds, state missionary, Alabama baptist state board of missions, was paid 1,500 to develop the presentation and to present the material. Accountant fees of 120 were paid for the preparation of the tax returns for the organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3,650%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $750 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.