Catholic Social Services of St Clair County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383171381
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Port Huron, MI, USA
- Phone
- 8109879100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,165,505
- Expenses
- $1,228,035
- Assets
- $391,496
- Liabilities
- $24,868
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
It is the mission of catholic social services of st. Clair county, inc. To preserve, strengthen, and support the quality of life for all families and individuals within our community.
What it reported doing in 2011
The substance abuse department of catholic social services of st. Clair county offers to the public a comprehensive, drug-free outpatient program for substance abuse treatment. We have specialty services designed for the criminal justice population and offer groups for parolees and probationers. Our local community corrections funders have awarded us dollars to provide outpatient services in our local intervention center. In addition, the department also offers prevention services at our county intervention center which includes sessions on life-skills such as anger management, coping and stress reduction. We provide screening and assessment services to our district court and complete secretary of state driver's license restoration assessments. Our community prevention programming reaches many preschool aged children in our county.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.4%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $80K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.