Catholic Media Works Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900628734
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Encinitas, CA, USA
Phone
7606351122
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religious Media, Communications
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,099
Expenses
$9,302
Assets
$91,575
Liabilities
$1,727

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY DEBELLIS (President)
  • JAMES AITCHISON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ANTHONY DEBELLIS (President)
  • JAMES AITCHISON (Vice President)
  • DUANE OSENTOSKI (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Catholic Media Works is dedicated to changing the culture by continuing the call of Pope John Paul II in 1999 to evangelize the world through media. We strive to do this through the careful selection and funding of high quality, morality-based film and media projects, facilitating the development of culturally and doctrinally relevant content from thought leading Catholic speakers, leveraging best-practice, intelligent use of mass media placement and promotional media distribution, and making resources and tools designed to inspire and empower Catholics to live out their Catholic Faith to the fullest widely accessible.

What it reported doing in 2013

Sale of champions of faith dvd - distributed and sold dvds of champions of faith: baseball edition to bookstores and individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.84; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -72.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.8% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.