Catholic Foundation for the Diocese of Tucson

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860408580
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2013
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Tucson, AZ, USA
Phone
5208382598
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,044,866
Expenses
$4,477,852
Assets
$19,795,031
Liabilities
$8,000,465

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARGIE PUERTA EDSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARGIE PUERTA EDSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $107,311 total reported compensation
  • MOST REV GERALD F KICANAS (CHAIRPERSON): $14,671 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the catholic foundation is to build endowments that provide enduring resources to support the mission of the church in the diocese of tucson.

What it reported doing in 2013

1 - catholic foundation accomplished programs dedicated to educating, motivating, and invigorating stewardship within the diocese of tucson. Through annual, major, and planned giving programs, the catholic foundation is able to garner resources in a fiscally transparent and responsible manner and distribute solicited gifts for the immediate and long term needs of the faith community of the diocese. The catholic foundation works to foster a faith community where its members prayerfully consider their stewardship responsibility and decide to commit a portion of their time, talent, and treasurers to serve the mission of christ.grants program - during the fiscal year ended december 31, 2013 the catholic foundation disbursed $3,110,472 in grants to parishes, schools, and other catholic ministry programs. Annual appeal the catholic foundation manages a robust annual appeal effort on behalf of the diocese of tucson. This effort, which raised $3,708,177 supports 26 diocesan level charities, ministries, and services essential to the pastoral needs of the diocese.endowment program the catholic foundation was designed to develop a means by which church needs could be met on a long-range, planned basis through an endowment program. The foundation has developed giving programs that allow people interested in making a lasting gift to do so with the assurance that the earnings from their donation will be distributed to religious, charitable, and educational programs within the diocese of tucson. The board of directors of the catholic foundation is called to exercise faithful, competent, and socially responsible stewardship in how it manages its financial resources. The foundation's endowment consists of approximately 79 individual funds established for a variety of purposes.charitable gift annuities for more than 25 years, the catholic foundation has maintained a successful charitable gift annuities (cga) program. During the past year, the foundation received one new cga account bringing the total number of cga accounts to 24.acts of the apostle society the acts of the apostle society was created to recognize those supporters who have made a provision for the catholic foundation and/or a parish, school, or any other catholic organization located within the diocese of tucson in their will or living trust, have established a charitable gift annuity, charitable remainder trust, or other type of planned gift of stewardship program. The catholic foundation provides education, training, and support to parish stewardship efforts within the diocese of tucson and works closely with pastors, lay ministers, and parishioners to encourage stewardship of time, talent, and treasurer as a way of life. Increasing a culture of stewardship within the diocese of tucson is a strategic priority.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $43.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 92%; rating input score 92; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.42; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 42.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 72.9% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $107K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 23 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.