Catholic Citizens Committee Foundation Inc C/o Presti & Naegele

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260295866
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2016
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
7182856769
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Roman Catholic
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$5,292
Assets
$960
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GEORGE R PREZIOSO (CHAIRMAN/CEO)
  • MARTIN J COTTINGHAM (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • DOROTHY CHRISTINE SIMON (EXEC VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KARL BLAHA (DIRECTOR)
  • ANDREW C PRESTI (TREASURER)
  • GEORGE R PREZIOSO (CHAIRMAN/CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This organization is formed to encourage faithful catholics to be active and contributing members of american society; to hold, conduct and organize meetings and discussions to consider opinions on relevant contemporary issues relevant to the catholic faith; to endeavor to inculcate and maintain high moral and ethical standards; to disseminate information to people of the catholic faith concerning goals and objectives of the corporation; and to engage in issue advocacy and direct and grassroots lobbying on contempoary issues relevant to the catholic faith.

What it reported doing in 2017

The foundation engages in issue advocacy and eduction for a number of social issues. These include school vouchers, choice and funding; same-sex marriage; abortion; adoption and poverty, especially housing, healthcare reform; and outreaches to the poor. The foundation relies on volunteers and will help organize concerted efforts to benefit society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -80% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -51.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.