Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680599307
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Juan, TX, USA
Phone
9567024088
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,272,908
Expenses
$3,943,049
Assets
$26,130,948
Liabilities
$3,745,787

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SR NORMA PIMENTEL (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHELLE NUNEZ (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $59,894 total reported compensation
  • AUX BISHOP MARIO AVILES (BOARD MEMBER): $30,142 total reported compensation
  • BISHOP DANIEL E FLORES (BOARD MEMBER): $30,142 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of catholic charities of the rio grande valley (ccrgv) is to improve the quality of life in the community we live, by providing help and creating hope for individuals and families experiencing a crisis in their lives, regardless of race or religion. Ccrgv and all catholic charities throughout the united states are committed to help end poverty in america by addressing and responding to the core issues of poverty, and in a more direct way, offering services to help families achieve self-sufficiency and financial independence. Ccrgv anticipates enhancing the emergency assistance program, placing a stronger emphasis on stabilization and self-sufficiency for individuals seeking emergency assistance.

What it reported doing in 2024

Catholic social servicesemergency assistance program: provides assistance in medical consultation, transportation, shelter, and other vital services.homelessness prevention program: focuses on housing for homeless and at-risk households. It provides temporary financial assistance, housing relocation and stabilization services to individuals and families who are homeless or would be homeless but for this assistance.pregnancy counseling program: provides confidential support, encouragement, guidance, and practical assistance to women (and/or their family) who are undergoing a crisis pregnancy, so they can feel supported and confident in choosing childbirth.counseling program: provides assistance with anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, marital and relationship issues to individuals, couples, teens and adults.disaster relief program: alleviates a family's burden that has been placed on the family after a disaster. Victims at risk of being homeless are assisted with financial assistance to restore their lives, reconstruct their damaged home, and/or provide temporary shelter.food program: promotes and maintains the health and nutritional status of children and adults, promote development of good eating habits, and integrate nutritious food service with organized day care services.humanitarian crisis response: responds to families in crisis. We believe that human beings who have no food, no security, no access to shower, etc., are people in crisis. We will continue responding to the needs of these families in crisis as long as there is a need. Thanks to all who have in any way or form helped thus far... All donors, volunteers, people praying for this cause, etc. God bless us all!

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 62% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.9%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 75.5%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14,942.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.63; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 69.9% of revenue deployed · 75.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 14 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.