Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Peoria

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
370662513
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Peoria, IL, USA
Phone
3096368000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,806,181
Expenses
$17,365,660
Assets
$2,471,522
Liabilities
$1,029,502

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Catholic charities of the diocese of peoria, inspired by christ, respects and defends the dignity of each person; empowers individuals, families and communities; advocates for a just and compassionate society; and encourages all people to join us in fulfilling our mission. Catholic charities is a dynamic witness of the social mission of the church. We support people in achieving their full potential and improving the quality of life in their communities. We are fully engaged with a passion for our mission; celebrate our diversity and are energized around a shared vision and common goals. Our focus on improvement, strengths, and our systemic philosophy is evident in all we do. As we honor our tradition and values, we respond to emerging needs and new challenges with a spirit of excellence, compassion and commitment for the greater good.

What it reported doing in 2011

Residential care - our guardian angel home is a residential treatment center that provides emotionally troubled boys ages 16-18 the necessary clinical intervention, counseling, recreational activities, medical care and spiritual enrichment to help each young man open up to his potential. We also assist them in making the transition to their home, or placement with a foster family, or when appropriate, into a successful, independent living situation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 88% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -20.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -52.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 18 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $16.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 25 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 28 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2011
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.