Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
750808769
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
Location
Fort Worth, TX, United States
Phone
817.534.0814
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$365,542,304
Expenses
$357,218,135
Assets
$76,945,062
Liabilities
$34,679,175

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michael Iglio (President/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Michael Iglio (President/CEO): $292,348 total reported compensation
  • Peter Hicks (Chief Operating Officer): $192,198 total reported compensation
  • Josh Audi (VP Administration/CFO): $188,231 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Relentlessly ending poverty through holistic, evidence-based solutions. Nearly 3,600 clients served through relief programs in 2022. Our Mission To provide service to those in need, to advocate compassion and justice in the structures of society, and to call all people of good will to do the same. Meet Our Board Of Directors. The beginning of our more than 100-year history was simple. A small group of women went to St. Patrick Cathedral in downtown Fort Worth to petition then-Bishop Edward J. Dunne to begin a “work of mercy.” They wanted to help the poor and vulnerable in their community, in any way they could. Sometimes that meant only being able to offer families a dollar or two. It wasn’t much, but it enabled families...

What it reported doing in 2024

WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION SERVICES - Several programs provide individuals with the resources and opportunities needed to obtain a living wage employment, including educational opportunities in targeted industries, and job placement services. Comprehensive support services are provided to low income students with the goal of helping them persist in school and obtain their degree. Services are targeted at helping students overcome obstacles outside of the classroom which might otherwise result in the student having to drop out of college. FAMILY SERVICES - These programs are designed to support the structure of a healthy family by offering free health assessments, pregnancy through early childhood education, and other support to strengthen families. FINANCIAL STABILIZATION SERVICES - These programs provide compassionate services by performing an initial needs assessment of a client and linking them to the appropriate Catholic Charities program or other community resources. Some activities include intensive case management, which addresses the needs of the whole person, not based off of funding parameters but by working to build and grow the strengths of each individual. Emergency rental, utility, and other assistance are available to Tarrant County residents and residents of surrounding counties in the Diocese. Disaster response services are also included, which equip staff to respond to and assist in disaster response situations, such as our response with COVID-19 and weather-related disasters. MENTAL & HEALTH SERVICES - Licensed professionals provide high quality mental health services for children, adolescents, adults, couples, and families to help with life's challenges. Financial assistance is available to assist with the cost of both mental and physical health services. Counseling and health services are provided on-site and at several parishes in the diocese. SUPPORTIVE PROGRAMS - Several programs provide oversight and strategic planning for operation of Catholic Charities, along with support to programs by ensuring that in-kind donation and volunteer needs are met by donors. They also work with diocesan parishes on their disaster planning and preparedness and to strengthen the relationship between Catholic Charities and the parishes throughout the Diocese.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 73% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: $173.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $350.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $292K · 29 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $70.6M reported
  • Consistency: 46 of 46 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 28 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.