Catawba Springs Elementary Pto
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270624508
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Denver, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7047361895
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,885
- Expenses
- $41,676
- Assets
- $38,696
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kari Ellsworth (Co-President)
- Autumn Lankford (Co-President)
- Whittney Hafele (Co-Vice President)
- Heather Jordan (Co-Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Kari Ellsworth (Co-President)
- Autumn Lankford (Co-President)
- Whittney Hafele (Co-Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Parent Teacher Organization (PTO) of Catawba Springs Elementary School is to promote the educational welfare of students through a partnership between families, teachers and administrators. As parent leaders, we accomplish this mission by coordinating activities for the teachers, families, and student body. We work diligently to identify sources of funds, partner with local businesses and community resources, and provide financial support not otherwise provided for in the school budgets. Funds raised cover the costs of classroom supplies, curriculum, technology, family fun nights, and more. Our purpose is to enrich the student's environment through volunteerism, cultural and educational events, and special programs. Research is clear, children at schools with a broad base of involved parents perform remarkably better in many different measurements of success.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided support for Catawba Springs Elementary School beyond what is provided by the county and state, including school needs and events for students and faculty to encourage community and parent involvement. Over 550 students and staff are impacted.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.5%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.5% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.