Castro Theatre Conservancy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883428716
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Historical Societies & Historic Preservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $1,929
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Byrne (President)
People named in this filing
- Robert Byrne (President)
- John Bengtson (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Castro Theatre Conservancy CTC is dedicated to preserving and protecting San Franciscos Castro Theatre as a cultural and entertainment venue for motion pictures and live performances. CTC goals include preserving the orchestra seating and sloped floor as well as to ensure film festivals luminaries of the world of cinema LGBTQ+ and other community events are able to continue using the theatre at affordable prices. CTC seeks to preserve and maintain the historical character and integrity of the theatre building its auditorium interior its historic decorative walls and ceilings and its raked seating acoustics and audience sight lines specifically designed for viewing motion pictures and to honor and celebrate the Castro Theatre as a neighborhood landmark and beacon for the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Despite the organizations efforts to preserve and protect the Castro Theatre private developers were permitted to remove the orchestra seating and sloped floor. The organization voted to terminate and dissolve in compliance with its governing documents once the seating and floors were permanently removed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 128.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -49.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -136.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.