Castle Rock Senior Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841231171
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Castle Rock, CO, USA
Phone
3036889498
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,042,422
Expenses
$990,738
Assets
$1,088,592
Liabilities
$41,096

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBRA HAYNIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • PHYLLIS TUMEY (PRESIDENT)
  • ED MATTIX (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEBRA HAYNIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $107,692 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The center is a community gathering place for seniors in and around castle rock, Colorado. We provide a wide range of activities, events, and programs, along with direct services such as transportation, wellness programs, and nutrition services.

What it reported doing in 2024

As a non-profit organization, the crsac provides organized activities and services to older adults in douglas county and surrounding areas. We currently have 1,350 members. We are one of the largest transportation providers for older adults and adults with disabilities in douglas county. We had over 584 registered riders and about 300 actively used the transportation program during 2024. We provided 12,557 rides with our shuttle services and 1,707 activity rides in 2024. As we continued to emerge from the pandemic, older adults re-engaged in our activities offerings which grew to an average of 158 programs offered each month. We made 2,239 reassurance calls to isolated older adults in 2024. We published a monthly newsletter, a weekly 411 email, a website and 4 social media sites (facebook, instagram, twitter and youtube). We provided older adults friendships, peer support, wellness and nutrition programs, activities, sports and entertainment. The center is also a volunteer of america (voa) congregate meal site and provided voa meals on wheels delivery services for douglas county. In 2024 we provided 6,789 hot lunches to older adults at the center and 16,190 frozen meal boxes for meals on wheels clients in douglas county. Volunteers play a critical role in helping us provide all the programs and services, in 2024 25,721 hours of services were donated.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $779K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.