Cascadia Wildlands
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931293019
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Eugene, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5414341463
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,617,698
- Expenses
- $1,382,057
- Assets
- $1,860,227
- Liabilities
- $14,097
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL KRUSE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOSH LAUGHLIN (EXECUTIVE DI): $121,455 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests, in the courts, and in the streets. We envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and vibrant communities sustained by the unique landscapes of the cascadia bioregion.
What it reported doing in 2024
1)halting massive mature and old-growth timber sales on public land in western Oregon proposed by the bureau of land management through grassroots organizing and litigation campaigns. 1)halting massive mature and old-growth timber sales on public land in western Oregon proposed by the bureau of land management through grassroots organizing and litigation campaigns. 2)advancing an amendment to the northwest forest plan that embraces tribal inclusion in forest planning and strengthens safeguards for mature and old-growth forests. 3)successfully urging the Oregon state land board to approve a forest management plan for the recently created elliott state research forest that prioritizes carbon storage, salmon and wildlife recovery, and tribal inclusion. 4)launching a lawsuit against the eugene water and electric board for ongoing violations of the endangered species act for failure to provide effective fish passage for bull trout and chinook salmon at trail bridge dam on the mckenzie river. 5)as a founding member of the pacific wolf coalition, successfully advocating for gray wolf recovery, which saw a 15% population increase over the past year in Oregon. 6)launching a lawsuit against the us fish and wildlife service for failure to list the north Oregon coast population of the red tree vole as a protected species under the endangered species act. 7)as a founding member of the Oregon wildlife coalition, achieving the passage of the beaver and water quality protection bill, which prohibits trapping and hunting in impaired water bodies on public lands in Oregon. 8)advancing strategies to aid the just transition off fossil fuels in buildings in eugene through our leadership role in the fossil free eugene coalition.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 91.1%; rating input score 91; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.3% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.