Casa of Laramie County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 710878684
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Cheyenne, WY, USA
- Phone
- 3072221902
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $175,254
- Expenses
- $268,012
- Assets
- $628,244
- Liabilities
- $10,219
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEAGAN HERRINGTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RHEA PARSONS (PRESIDENT)
- ARIN SCHELENSKER (FORMER PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH URBANEK (EXCUTIVE DIRECTOR): $84,096 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a volunteer court-appointed special advocate for abused and neglected children in laramie county. Vision: to ensure that every eligible child in laramie county who has been abused or neglected has a casa.
What it reported doing in 2024
Casa of laramie county's sole program goal is to support abused and neglected children through enlisting, training and supervising volunteers to work with court appointed children in need . As part of this program, volunteers are trained and matched with children, children are provided a support system outside the conflict they may be facing at home or in the foster care system, children are provided safe, fun activities such as movie nights or play time through casa supported events, and children are supported through programs like shoes for kids, which provides any children in laramie county with a voucher for a free pair of shoes. The organization also acts to provide awareness to the community about child neglect and abuse in an effort to stop the cycle. As part of this program, volunteers are trained to work with the children who have been abused or neglected, learning to understand the impacts and risks associated with abuse and neglect and how to work with the children to ensure that their needs are met and advocated for in the court system. Volunteers are then matched with children based on their individual needs and the volunteers skill sets. Volunteers act as a support system for these children, helping them navigate the complex child welfare system, advocating for their needs, as well as sharing the child's wishes for the case. Children are also supported by helping to provide essential items like blankets, hygiene products, and new shoes. The organization also acts to provide awareness to the community about child abuse and neglect, in an effort to stop the cycle of abuse.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 49.6%; rating input score 50
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -52.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.34; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.1% of revenue deployed · 49.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $133K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.